[racket-dev] Testing 'disappeared-use bindings and Check Syntax

From: Robby Findler (robby at eecs.northwestern.edu)
Date: Fri Dec 3 17:36:59 EST 2010

Yeah sure. You can do that. The current CS test does that (but only
checks colors and arrows not renaming).

At the moment however the test suite is broken due to a race condition

Iny any case let's sit together soon and I'll show you the current
state and maybe we can improve it.


On Friday, December 3, 2010, Casey Klein <clklein at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> In light of PR 11469 (http://bit.ly/hvvT90), I'd like to write test
> cases to check that Redex sets 'disappeared-use in a way that makes
> Check Syntax's renaming work properly.
> I was hoping there would be some kind of Check Syntax mixin that I
> could apply to an editor to get a class that lets me insert a program
> and rename specific variables, but that does not seem to be the case.
> All I see is a DrRacket tool interface. Is there any hope for working
> at that level (e.g., by scripting a DrRacket session that opens a
> file, clicks Check Syntax, right-clicks a variable, etc.)?
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Posted on the dev mailing list.