[racket-dev] require sub-forms

From: Noel Welsh (noelwelsh at gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 25 10:15:38 EDT 2010

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com> wrote:
> That's not my bad idea, which might not be so bad actually. I'm
> imagine a new require/provide transformer that names sets of exports:

And then it only a hop, skip, and jump to expansion-time units. Which
would actually make me happy when I'm in performance-obsessed mode.

My implementation of said idea is here:
It lacks signatures, which is what you're proposing, but mostly works.


Posted on the dev mailing list.