[racket-dev] require sub-forms

From: Shriram Krishnamurthi (sk at cs.brown.edu)
Date: Tue Aug 24 22:46:23 EDT 2010

Is there a way to say "give me all the require sub-forms" instead of
having to enumerate them explicitly:

(provide require only-in except-in prefix-in rename-in combine-in
only-meta-in for-syntax for-template for-label for-meta)

thereby missing some in future extensions of the base language?

Posted on the dev mailing list.