[racket-dev] Release Announcement for v5.0.1 -- final version

Eli: are you saying that those commits were not included in the
testing bundles? If so, why do we need to re-run the release tests?
(Or is there something else?)

Robby

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> On Aug  2, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>> > On Aug  2, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>> >> On Aug 2, 2010, at 6:11 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > And for the (near) future -- figure out what's happenning in the
>> >> >  teaching languages.  I get the impression that things are moving
>> >> >  there almost randomly.
>> >>
>> >> No, this isn't random; it is unsynchronized:
>> >
>> > (Yeah, I used "random" in a random sense...)
>> >
>> >>  -- Shriram asked Jay to add define-datatype
>> >
>> > (and hashes? was there more?)
>>
>> define-datatype, match, hashes
>>
>> These are the commits:
>>
>> http://github.com/plt/racket/commit/407dcee206678785b4b87bb513d7ba5f55ad8ab5
>>
>> http://github.com/plt/racket/commit/eeada45868d73c02b59f5c1ecd16e414d5a114ac
>>
>> http://github.com/plt/racket/commit/9eb053d4db1efd2881e1f749ad6b1eb12a6e8152
>
> (For future references, the sha1 is all that is needed.)
>
> None of these commits are included.  This leaves the last mess:
> running proper tests.
>
> --
>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev