[plt-dev] Re: [PRL] Programming Languages in the Code of Federal Regulations

From: Bryan Chadwick (chadwick at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Tue Apr 27 17:07:17 EDT 2010

That's my point...

x86 assembly is certainly a programming language, and my machine is
just an interpreter, but I'm pretty sure the writers of the proposal
don't see it that way.

> This text is gibberish. How do you get an answer if you don't
> interpret your program? Why is x86 not a programming language?

Posted on the dev mailing list.