[plt-dev] some Racket proposals & implementation

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Sat Apr 3 20:37:47 EDT 2010

At Sat, 3 Apr 2010 18:30:57 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
> Does it make sense to give this revision to define-struct a different
> name and keep the same old define-struct around from scheme/base?

Lots of other forms and procedures have `struct' in the name, so if we
just change `struct' to something else, we'd either have a mismatch or
have many other changes.

Or did you have a different kind of change in mind?

Posted on the dev mailing list.