| From: David Van Horn (dvanhorn at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Fri May 22 15:30:14 EDT 2009 |
|
Eli Barzilay wrote: > And BTW, these are two votes -- I expected many more people to say > something given how many people wanted to see this thing in. I think the srfi/1 module should be compatible with SRFI 1. The scheme/list version should do whatever the PLT consensus is. I like mandatory 2 arguments. David
| Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}